Post by account_disabled on Mar 6, 2024 0:36:03 GMT -6
Scandal, in silence and without giving any other explanation that I did not feel like continuing to attend the program. I had many calls for me to reconsider my position but it is clear that I did not. And that was the extent of my participation in that program in which I received a significant amount of money for each participation. Of course, a year after leaving the program - and therefore without having any relationship with my decision to retire - I found out that pedro j. Ramírez was paid three times more than me . Not even miguel barroso was honest in that. He lied about everything he told me. He even cheated on me in the only condition I set. -- another day I will explain how the president of spanish television, luis fernández , recently arrived at his position, at a meal in currito, in the casa de campo, sounded me out to see if I would be interested in directing a newspaper that was then being prepared: público . And I told him, surprised: “I thought that project was not for spanish television.” I relate this fact because the appointment of luis fernández at rtve was the personal work of miguel barroso, who, when he was no longer secretary of state for communication, and used the management of the casa de américa for his political and personal assignments in latin america, visited luis fernández in miami to offer you spanish television. The friends of barroso and fernández are always in pole position of zapatero's power .
But that is another story of how zapatero's friends have become rich in the proximity of power that I will be able to tell another day. -- the truth is that a friendship between the president of the government and pedro j. Ramírez, which was planned, also taking Special Database into account personal and family interests, by miguel barroso has not only lasted to this day but has culminated in the fact of that zapatero rarely makes important decisions without comparing them with the director of el mundo. What are we going to do if the ethics of convenience has replaced the ethics of principles! We are in an era in which possibilism has displaced ideologies. Carnicero assures that “the president of the government has ended up in the hands of pedro j. Ramírez, who also boasts privately and publicly of his ascendancy over the president of the government. […] Now he is the advisor and head psychologist of a president of the government who will be stabbed because it is known that the scorpion uses the stinger for the sole reason that it has it incorporated into its anatomy. You can consult carnicero's blog by clicking here .
As el confidencial digital has learned , the grade that democracy deserves in spain, and which appears prominently on the cover of this study in book format, is 5.8, thus passing the “good” that the democratic system obtained spanish last year, with a 6.0, to the simple “pass” this year. Thus, the decline in the measurement of the quality of spanish institutions is consolidated, while, in 2008, the same study gave a 6.2 to spanish democracy . The alternatives document, not yet released by the foundation, will be presented to society at the end of june , specifically on the 28th, in an event in which the leading role will fall on joaquín almunia , historic leader of the psoe, competition commissioner of the european union and member of the board of the alternativas foundation. Notable progressive scholars have participated in the preparation of the 2010 report , who analyze spanish institutions by sector (economy, foreign policy...) , and offer, at the end of each chapter, a panoramic summary of the main problems faced by the different areas of the spanish political action. Joaquín estefanía, mariano bacigalupo, emilio ontiveros, josé ignacio torreblanca and ignacio sánchez cuenca , among others, are the intellectuals who contribute their vision in this volume, which also has the collaboration of the former socialist minister juan manuel eguiagaray , director of the laboratory ( study service) of the foundation.